首页> 外文OA文献 >Non-mydriatic Polaroid photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: evaluation in a clinical setting
【2h】

Non-mydriatic Polaroid photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: evaluation in a clinical setting

机译:非散瞳宝丽来摄影筛查糖尿病性视网膜病变:在临床环境中的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Because of fears that Polaroid colour prints produced with a non-mydriatic fundus camera may not detect important sight threatening lesions in diabetes a study was conducted comparing retinal images obtained on Polaroid prints taken in “field” conditions with those on 35 mm transparencies and fluorescein angiograms. Almost one in five (22/127) Polaroid prints could not be assessed owing to poor quality compared with 3 (2.4%) 35 mm transparencies and 2 (1.6%) fluorescein angiograms. The pick up rate of microaneurysms, haemorrhages, and hard and soft (cotton wool spots) exudates was equivalent for Polaroid prints and 35 mm transparencies of equivalent quality. In two cases with disc new vessels, however, these were not seen on the Polaroid prints.
机译:由于担心使用非散瞳眼底照相机产生的宝丽来彩色照片可能无法检测到糖尿病中重要的视力损害,因此进行了一项研究,将在“野外”条件下拍摄的宝丽来照片上获得的视网膜图像与35毫米透明胶片和荧光素血管造影照片进行了比较。 。由于质量差,几乎无法评估五分之一(22/127)的宝丽来照片,而3毫米(2.4%)的35毫米透明胶片和2幅(1.6%)荧光素血管造影照片无法评估。对于宝丽来印刷品和等效质量的35毫米透明胶片,微动脉瘤,出血,硬和软(棉绒斑点)渗出物的吸收率相同。然而,在两例装有新盘的血管的病例中,在宝丽来照片上看不到这些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号